BIA Edge

Practice resources

Practice resources

Immigration Practice Resources

Search immigration practice advisories, sample filings, manuals, brief banks, and government guidance from trusted practitioner sources.

More filters
Clear all
920 resources 24 sources 848 direct files

Results

Showing 625-636 of 920 resources.

Sorted by Newest first
Immigrant Legal Resource Center Practice advisory Mar 12, 2013

Post-Conviction Relief in California Should Be Unaffected by Chaidez v. United States

In Chaidez v. United State s, 568 U.S. _____, ____S.Ct.____, 2013 WL 610201, (February 20, 2013) the U.S. Supreme Court held that Padilla v. Kentucky , 559 U.S. 356 (2010) was a “new rule” that did not apply retroactively to convictions final before March 31, 2010. In Padilla , the Supreme Court held that the Sixth Amendment requires criminal defense counsel to advise a noncitizen about the immigration consequences of a guilty plea.

Crimes and categorical approach Cross-forum Direct PDF
National Immigration Project Practice advisory Jan 15, 2013

Practice Advisory: Matter of Davey & the Categorical Approach

This practice advisory discusses the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) decision in Matter of Davey, 26 I&N Dec. 37 (BIA 2012) and its holding that the categorical approach does not apply to the “possession of 30 grams of marijuana” exception to deportability found in 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(B)(i), INA § 237(a)(2)(B)(i).

BIA appeals Immigration court BIA Direct PDF
Immigrant Legal Resource Center Practice advisory Oct 15, 2012

Arguing That a California Infraction is Not a Conviction; Test for Non-Misdemeanor Offenses

Practice Advisory: The BIA held that a violation of a Kansas municipal ordinance is a conviction for immigration purposes despite the lack of appointed defense counsel or right to a jury trial in those proceedings. Matter of Cuellar , 25 I&N Dec. 850 (BIA 2012).

Crimes and categorical approach BIA appeals BIA Direct PDF
ASISTA Practice advisory Sep 7, 2012

ASISTA Practice Advisory: U Update: Cap Queue and DACA Derivatives Practice Pointers (September 7, 2012)

���T�E%p����ST�rD�n��o� ��$M���w�P�(�/of܌��P�|�J a-q�!E�=��C��R���V��׳�g�T�4V.mE���=��*�L��0�#��[��1���;s�͵�p�� �i����t��\��eJ�1�8 !@Nr���)�:B1�f|� ����-��m� `ԏ��n��b����pOL 0k����`� �����I��6 h�M�ˮ �ݽ�J`��9U��\���W���!�����u�L�W���/nH!�Wa�[�&�HL�R�u�o�ڪ&��&�t�y��62�H:�0� ��3��~�E8�fNU�D B� ŘR��\ iO��q��"�(X��Z�8���B5�rR�f��&��`�*���Up�� �K�4��zX Ҭ�+��k hݗ�M�U �jH��qfo�T��_���i.�M�>j�� ��~.@���R*P�_]�A�v�e��J*?�٨�ȎLqjϼ��`Y�A�h��L��G�!�W:�@����W

VAWA / U / T Family-based practice USCIS Immigration court Direct PDF
ASISTA Practice advisory Sep 1, 2012

ASISTA Practice Advisory: DACA, VAWA, & U Visa Applications (September 2012)

%PDF-1.3 %��������� 4 0 obj << /Length 5 0 R /Filter /FlateDecode >> stream x�]�s��u� (^CrčA����c�\qMEt��\'�-�*.+������{��{�8ghg�"0@��W�n@I�K��%����W��v�v�6����w���o~)�/�����/�ge�~�I�G��H���~�֍���ǟ���E��E��c�I/��?�� �W07y��i�z�m�7}�iYg}� J�BFI:CI2��x%#i$��h�m�4A$s��B��H�e�:�Ӯ�֫#ٖ��HG�JE�^1G�_�X�e^g]��/z�� ��W�'ǧ��"� �Ù;� ]$r��i�.<]��1/\����!�� �Kw�?pr|���K�v��� F�9}�SM���:+/���u�zi&b�C�)�mVm�]��EV�@� ˋ$ϪtS]���?��(r�t��DE�C�p�{8���� �:ݜ����uM�5�&���PD���

VAWA / U / T Family-based practice USCIS Immigration court Direct PDF
ASISTA Practice advisory Aug 1, 2012

ASISTA Newsletter August 2012: A Practice Guide for Representing Self-Petitioning Applicants With Criminal Convictions or Criminal History (Part 3 of 3)

eV�#+fC �SЦ�1�޷Yɓ! �YL��<���� �D�/�n�����%ӧ��W<`lo���k�|���\�R䝾��JX� Mz}g���:�l� ����b��s�"��ŷ�^�5G�/䁦�{���/P' ƚA{Š�G���܂BnI�d��Q���Hs `�歎ۀ�z�l2�e��#�^��/��os:�o�:4O]�l `�=�9���Yr���Cn���˔��W�f_���mE��<�uu͈�f�*\.im}�i�o�xf�[�K`���$M,\Z/��i���k���m ߱����Y��m��@>�=��H4�/��x�� @k 1� K��n@~J��F�t�<a*�l�dK�����������\�LOS�ξ�)����LM�&�|n�drdp]�A�P����t��� �WSD�7�r�� '}�͎��j��m�>�;|�[�.�b� ͙�hp���/�j:�����Ѭ4 B� 3>���Y�eM5�_�J�V��2�� �%�5���{��yrD'U0���� �i���f��-

VAWA / U / T Family-based practice USCIS Immigration court Direct PDF
ASISTA Practice advisory Jul 1, 2012

ASISTA Newsletter July 2012: A Practice Guide for Representing Self-Petitioning Applicants With Criminal Convictions or Criminal History (Part 2 of 3)

%PDF-1.3 %��������� 4 0 obj << /Length 5 0 R /Filter /FlateDecode >> stream x��ٲlWv��|�4��#��+���V(Z�u� � �B��!aP��|�s5�{�#U��*B�䟳 �s���k�����߶���|�l�����o��u�?�?��7��׿������Z����ԟ��a{>�_o����o����|��Ɵ��o���a��~���������l��cM�8�ayg{<�8�g��q�����`�����b.���i{��^ϗy��_�?����w� ~��h�]��������~����Ԛ��z����t��,�w8]^O��D�e�mO1H��L�8BOqx3��LS\_��i���=����;��n8�= �%�s3�� R K� K��� Co��������z?���M ϗ����������m���9�O�� >E��*�-�6M��B�����;��5�>Z�흍������x�jQ����_/��~wx%�'�w=�� :��

VAWA / U / T Family-based practice USCIS Immigration court Direct PDF
ASISTA Practice advisory Jun 1, 2012

ASISTA Newsletter June 2012: A Practice Guide for Representing Self-Petitioning Applicants With Criminal Convictions or Criminal History (Part 1 of 3)

%PDF-1.3 %��������� 4 0 obj << /Length 5 0 R /Filter /FlateDecode >> stream x��ٲ��u��|�6�)I{W� ��Jl�щ�s�(BrTa�l�D�'ߘs�M�>� )��Α��������������o��n{�^���i����y�߷_�����mw���}����p����z�^O���e���_�ߜ�����ۯ߿�o����m�n�����n��}u������r��t��� m~��Χ���45s������?l��8�󣏏簿l �9 ���O��y�� !��Zގ����|9��N����z��T���~��w�����o����7��R��(�nd�"_����/�骋��������R����ty=�>�� �(vxlatqxӅ�L]\_��S/C<�����qܝ_o7�= ��3g� �l�y����m���t9���������|9�����Sr���%� r���v���${���x0J����B3�Pg�;��΄�^ ����?����.�

VAWA / U / T Family-based practice USCIS Immigration court Direct PDF
National Immigration Project Sample brief Apr 5, 2012

Vartelas v. Holder: Implications for LPRs Who Take Brief Trips Abroad and Other Potential Favorable Impacts

This advisory describes (1) the Court’s decision in Vartelas ; (2) its potential impact on LPRs who take brief trips abroad; (3) suggested steps that lawyers (or immigrants themselves) may take immediately in pending or already concluded removal proceedings involving such individuals; and (4) some of the other potential favorable impacts of the decision.

Removal defense Immigration court BIA Direct PDF