BIA Edge

Practice resources

Practice resources

Immigration Practice Resources

Search immigration practice advisories, sample filings, manuals, brief banks, and government guidance from trusted practitioner sources.

More filters
Clear all
920 resources 24 sources 848 direct files
Common starting points
Immigration court deadline 626 Asylum merits package 95 Motions, stays, and pretermission 139 Bond, detention, and habeas 85 BIA, PFR, and federal court 468 USCIS and AAO appeals 216 Crim-imm screening 158 VAWA, U, T, and survivor relief 199
Workflow: BIA, PFR, and federal court Clear

Results

Showing 49-60 of 468 resources.

Sorted by Newest first
NIWAP Library Amicus brief Jun 18, 2025

Jane Doe v. Claire McIntire

Jane Doe v. Claire McIntire, App. No. 01-P-1013 (Mass.) (August 10, 2001) Amicus brief appealing a denial of TANF benefits to two immigrant women lawfully residing in Massachusetts, the denial was based on six month residence requirement before receiving benefits. One woman was fleeing domestic violence and the other residing with family during pregnancy. (Foley, Hoag & Eliot, Pro Bono)

Evidence and procedure BIA Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
Immigration Equality Practice advisory Jun 1, 2025

Pretermission Web Advisory for Pro Bono Attorneys

Overview of recent EOIR policy changes allowing dismissal or pretermission of some defensive asylum applications without a hearing, with guidance for practitioners representing people in removal proceedings.

Asylum Removal defense Evidence and procedure Immigration court BIA Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
ASISTA Practice advisory Apr 24, 2025

ASISTA Practice Alert: USCIS Wet Ink Signature RFEs & NOIDs (April 24, 2025)

%PDF-1.4 %���� 1 0 obj <> endobj 3 0 obj <> endobj 4 0 obj <> endobj 9 0 obj <> stream x�}��J�`� kA�A� \��h���X\[�V�4M�؟�������&.ހ�e(��%���o$����{x�/�@$�*�N�s˥�Q� S�L��eZ}����K�}^�'7��v���!y�.�'��V��>�����s<���^�(���F�>–���7�V�=���f���WtV�%J��-�جS�#LQ�"��'IB� EN��Py�zfISP�Y��H)����� ���@� &/C�~�{ �e�6�����1]shE�H� ��0W��'�9�]�Y�?����bM��4 �?��K� endstream endobj 8 0 obj <> stream �����JFIF���������C�      $.' ",# (7),01444 '9=82<.342���C  2! !2

VAWA / U / T Family-based practice USCIS Immigration court Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
Immigrant Legal Resource Center Practice advisory Apr 17, 2025

Who Has Initial Jurisdiction Over UC Asylum Claims? Matter of M-A-C-O- and JOP v. DHS

The Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008 confers initial jurisdiction over asylum claims filed by unaccompanied children (UCs) to the asylum office. The Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision in Matter of M-A-C-O- , along with policy changes implemented during the first Trump administration, sought to strip away this crucial protection from many child asylum seekers. Because of these changes and legal challenges by immigrant youth advocates, the current landscape of initial

Asylum BIA appeals Children and SIJS BIA Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
Immigrant Legal Resource Center Practice advisory Apr 3, 2025

Quick Guide: Defending SIJS Clients in Removal Proceedings

This practice advisory, authored with our partners at the End SIJS Backlog Coalition, Children's Immigration Law Academy, National Immigration Project, and Safe Passage Project, offers strategies at every stage of an SIJS client’s removal proceedings to advocate against the client’s removal and to preserve the record for appeal, including:

Removal defense BIA appeals Special immigrant Immigration court BIA Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
National Immigration Project Practice advisory Apr 2, 2025

Quick Guide: Defending SIJS Clients in Removal Proceedings

This practice advisory, created by The End SIJS Backlog Coalition, is intended to help practitioners navigate removal proceedings for clients with pending or approved SIJS. It offers strategies at every stage of an SIJS client’s removal proceedings to advocate against the client’s removal and to preserve the record for appeal. Section II covers strategies for pleading to the Notice to Appear. Section III discusses challenging the Department of Homeland Security’s evidence of removability. Sectio

Removal defense BIA appeals Special immigrant Immigration court BIA Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
ASISTA Practice advisory Mar 3, 2025

Practice Alert: New ICE Guidance on Current or Potential Victim-Based Benefits (Updated March 3, 2025)

%PDF-1.6 %���� 255 0 obj <> endobj 280 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[ ]/Index[255 63]/Info 254 0 R/Length 116/Prev 247387/Root 256 0 R/Size 318/Type/XRef/W[1 3 1]>>stream h�bbd```b``N��}`r"�d� "���$;�d�������v����� �����I9�D2���C^�H�:��"���6 �Ԩ*��o�� ;201B�� V�F����3�� endstream endobj startxref 0 %%EOF 317 0 obj <>stream h�b```�� � � �@��(�����I�e�8�� 6�P�T�k ���vKr�~��t�_����>Kf��?|���n��o;;�;:]2:�L!���:P�[�̱H��X$�A�і͓I�q3� � �X��d��� L���*q �Π��

VAWA / U / T Family-based practice USCIS Immigration court Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record