Practice resources
Search immigration practice advisories, sample filings, manuals, brief banks, and government guidance from trusted practitioner sources.
Call and message your members of Congress telling them to oppose any effort to give ICE and Border Patrol more funding.
%PDF-1.7 %���� 1 0 obj <>/Metadata 141 0 R/ViewerPreferences 142 0 R>> endobj 2 0 obj <> endobj 3 0 obj <>/ExtGState<>/XObject<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI] >>/Annots[ 16 0 R 22 0 R 28 0 R 29 0 R 30 0 R] /MediaBox[ 0 0 612 792] /Contents 4 0 R/Group<>/Tabs/S/StructParents 0>> endobj 4 0 obj <> stream x��]K������=|70h4;A�H�rX���x�=��l&������*[-�2⃥�����z~,R�÷���yx�����> ��� >�|���/���p �Nÿ^�b#��f.6��4�ᗏ�_�����ׯ ߿~������ _���"6�Aj3����4���]�o��ӿ��O�/�����W߽~����w�_}��
Practice alert on USCIS interviews for VAWA self-petitioners, including rollout details and practitioner reporting requests tied to field-office implementation.
Chart-based comparison of VAWA self-petitions and VAWA special-rule cancellation of removal, with eligibility and strategy differences called out side by side.
Eligibility for U Nonimmigrant Status, commonly known as the “U Visa,” hinges on whether the applicant has been the “victim” of a qualifying crime. The regulations implementing the U visa statute contemplate three categories of “victims” who may qualify for the U visa: direct, bystander, and indirect victims. This practice advisory provides a basic overview of the requirements for U nonimmigrant eligibility. It then discusses the definition of “victim” and three different ways to qualify as a vi
In Department of State v. Muñoz , 602 U.S. 899 (2024), the U.S. Supreme Court concluded that a U.S. citizen and her noncitizen spouse had no access to judicial review of a consular officer’s denial of an immigrant visa. The Court held that a U.S. citizen has no “fundamental liberty interest” i n her spouse’s admission to the United States. This practice advisory, by the American Immigration Council, the International Refugee Assistance Project, and the Consular Accountability Project, is intende
%PDF-1.4 %���� 1 0 obj <> endobj 3 0 obj <> endobj 4 0 obj <> endobj 11 0 obj <> endobj 13 0 obj <> stream x�}��J�`� kA�A� \��h���X\[�V�4M�؟�������&.ހ�e(��%���o$����{x�/�@$�*�N�s˥�Q� S�L��eZ}����K�}^�'7��v���!y�.�'��V��>�����s<���^�(���F�>���7�V�=���f���WtV�%J��-�جS�#LQ�"��'IB� EN��Py�zfISP�Y��H)����� ���@� &/C�~�{ �e�6�����1]shE�H� ��0W��'�9�]�Y�?����bM��4 �?��K� endstream endobj 12 0 obj <> stream x�콇{S��.�/|�}�=��_�U]H/'9i����$W5IB��E�+=@ ��{/Ү�\hl �w[�|3
Addresses strategy when inadmissibility issues surface late in a U-visa case and explains how to preserve the case rather than treating the new issue as fatal.
%PDF-1.4 %���� 1 0 obj <> endobj 3 0 obj <> endobj 4 0 obj <> endobj 10 0 obj <> endobj 12 0 obj <> stream x�}��J�`� kA�A� \��h���X\[�V�4M�؟�������&.ހ�e(��%���o$����{x�/�@$�*�N�s˥�Q� S�L��eZ}����K�}^�'7��v���!y�.�'��V��>�����s<���^�(���F�>���7�V�=���f���WtV�%J��-�جS�#LQ�"��'IB� EN��Py�zfISP�Y��H)����� ���@� &/C�~�{ �e�6�����1]shE�H� ��0W��'�9�]�Y�?����bM��4 �?��K� endstream endobj 11 0 obj <> stream x��}�_Y�������k��Pw�-n�յ�{O���]�a��u�m��S�!��J� ��!$����"�"$7��'
In a case brought in Federal District Court in Rhode Island an abused spouse whose VAWA self-petition had been approved challenged USCIS’s revocation of her approved petition. The self-petitioner was divorced from her abuser and remarried after filing the self-petition but before the self-petition had been approved. The court’s ruling allows the self-petitioner to fully litigate her challenge the USCIS’s revocation of her self-petition due to remarriage in Federal District Court. The court’s rul
%PDF-1.4 %���� 1 0 obj <> endobj 3 0 obj <> endobj 8 0 obj <> endobj 10 0 obj <> stream x�}��J�`� kA�A� \��h���X\[�V�4M�؟�������&.ހ�e(��%���o$����{x�/�@$�*�N�s˥�Q� S�L��eZ}����K�}^�'7��v���!y�.�'��V��>�����s<���^�(���F�>���7�V�=���f���WtV�%J��-�جS�#LQ�"��'IB� EN��Py�zfISP�Y��H)����� ���@� &/C�~�{ �e�6�����1]shE�H� ��0W��'�9�]�Y�?����bM��4 �?��K� endstream endobj 9 0 obj <> stream x��w|W�>����|~ﻛ۪.�l����.� )[rU�$���!��q�� �6@$!ͽ�T�Ir��zs�Er�w�r�E6�᠏,͌�43�=��s
%PDF-1.4 %���� 1 0 obj <> endobj 3 0 obj <> endobj 4 0 obj <> endobj 8 0 obj <> endobj 10 0 obj <> stream x�c``<��, �y%EA�N �Q �� �� p��o� j/��Q� p��'�@,S� h$�-�a+��I� �]^RPd{��E!A�@v �����NBb'�Է��6�9��w3��C�2 C���,�200O@�%�d`���� q !����� h��1DX$%��X��)-����r�H� \Ѱ���&�y2 � �@�ΐÐ �d�cHf��� ��[=� endstream endobj 9 0 obj <> stream x�콅_���?����ϱ�XQ�9�s�c�"5�Q*�������t��݁I��K�P� %������fcl�6�� χǃcq�����.��;up��� 8p��� 8p��� 8p��� 8p��� 8p�