BIA Edge

Practice resources

Practice resources

Immigration Practice Resources

Search immigration practice advisories, sample filings, manuals, brief banks, and government guidance from trusted practitioner sources.

More filters
Clear all
920 resources 24 sources 848 direct files
Common starting points
Immigration court deadline 626 Asylum merits package 95 Motions, stays, and pretermission 139 Bond, detention, and habeas 85 BIA, PFR, and federal court 468 USCIS and AAO appeals 216 Crim-imm screening 158 VAWA, U, T, and survivor relief 199
Workflow: BIA, PFR, and federal court Clear

Results

Showing 265-276 of 468 resources.

Sorted by Newest first
ACLU Practice advisory Mar 21, 2018

Practice Advisory: Prolonged Detention Challenges after Jennings v. Rodriguez

Practice Advisory: Prolonged Detention Challenges after Jennings v. Rodriguez | American Civil Liberties Union Skip navigation document Practice Advisory: Prolonged Detention Challenges after Jennings v. Rodriguez Document Date: March 21, 2018 Download document Download document Skip to PDF content Related Issues Immigrants' Rights Immigrants' Rights and Detention

Detention / bond Federal court Removal defense Immigration court Federal district court Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
American Immigration Council Practice advisory Feb 6, 2018

The Basics of Motions to Reopen EOIR-Issued Removal Orders

This practice advisory provides a basic overview of motions to reopen removal orders that are filed with the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR), which consists of immigration courts throughout the country and the Board of Immigration Appeals, located in Falls, Church Virginia. The advisory also provides basic information about how to seek a stay in conjunction with the filing of a motion to reopen.

Removal defense Motions to reopen / reconsider BIA appeals Immigration court BIA Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
Immigrant Legal Resource Center Practice advisory Jul 21, 2017

Practice Alert on Flores v. Sessions: Ninth Circuit Holds that All Detained Children Have the Right to a Bond Hearing

This practice alert provides a summary of Flores v. Sessions , a recent Ninth Circuit decision that held that all detained children have the right to a bond hearing. It discusses why Flores v. Sessions was necessary, what its impact may be for detained youth, and details practice tips for advocates representing detained children seeking bond hearings.

Detention / bond Children and SIJS Court of appeals Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
Immigrant Defense Project Practice advisory Jun 8, 2017

Esquivel-Quintana v. Sessions

Practice advisory on the Supreme Court’s Esquivel-Quintana decision and its effect on the aggravated-felony sexual-abuse-of-a-minor ground and related crim-imm arguments.

Crimes and categorical approach Removal defense Immigration court BIA Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
American Immigration Council Practice advisory Aug 10, 2016

Practice Tip: Building the Record for Employment-Based Petitions

We encourage business immigration practitioners to consider using litigation as a tool to achieve client objectives. This Practice Tip outlines how you can build a strong administrative record to set the stage for challenging the denial of a client’s visa petition in federal court.

Employment Federal court Consular practice Cross-forum Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
American Immigration Council Practice advisory Aug 10, 2016

Practice Tip: Responding to a Request for Evidence

This Practice Tip explains how practitioners can turn a Request for Evidence (RFE) into an opportunity to strengthen the administrative record through a thoughtful and thorough response. It also includes advice about how to review the RFE, prepare the client, assess the evidence, obtain additional evidence, and structure the response. While the immediate goal of an RFE response is to obtain petition approval, building a strong administrative record is crucial if federal court review becomes a mu

Federal court Evidence and procedure Cross-forum Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
American Immigration Council Practice advisory Jul 14, 2016

Finality of Removal Orders for Judicial Review Purposes

The Immigration and Nationality Act authorizes the courts of appeals to review “final” removal orders. This Practice Advisory addresses whether a removal decision issued by an Immigration Judge or the BIA is a “final” removal order for purposes of federal court review.

Removal defense BIA appeals Federal court Immigration court BIA Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
American Immigration Council Practice advisory Jul 14, 2016

How to File a Petition for Review

Noncitizens may file a petition for review in the court of appeals to seek judicial review of a final removal order. This Practice Advisory addresses the procedures and general requirements for filing and litigating a petition for review.

Removal defense BIA appeals Federal court BIA Court of appeals Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
American Immigration Council Practice advisory Jul 14, 2016

How to Get Judicial Relief Under 8 USC 1447(b) for a Stalled Naturalization Application

Section 336(b) of the INA, 8 U.S.C. § 1447(b), gives a district court jurisdiction to intervene in a case where USCIS has failed to make a decision on the naturalization application within 120 days of the applicant’s “examination” by USCIS. This Practice Advisory discusses the nuts and bolts of bringing a suit under INA § 336(b). It also discusses when attorneys fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act are available.

Naturalization Federal court USCIS Federal district court Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record